All posts by user

Svalbard polar bear research: Day 5

Jon Aars is a researcher with the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway’s main institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. With the support of WWF, Aars studies polar bear populations on the Norwegian island of Svalbard. Read all of  his field notes from a Spring 2013 research expedition, and follow the bears on our Polar Bear Tracker.
fig 9 (Medium)
29 April – We left KV Svalbard a week ago, and have not been out flying for eight days because of bad weather. That is how it works in the Arctic, low pressure systems can bring bad weather for periods of days, and helicopter flying is risky if conditions are not good. With white snow, and moderate sun light, it is hard to see the contrasts on the snow and easy to crash a helicopter flying close to the ground. Darting bears, we fly on only a few meters altitude.
But today, when the weather suddenly improved, we flew to Storfjorden, between the largest islands in Svalbard. This is core polar bear habitat, and we were efficient working from early morning to late night. All together we handled 11 bears, a number we rarely reach in one day of work. It feels good to get that much done after a long period without being able to work, particularly as tomorrow will be our last field day this spring.
Among the bears we captured were two old females on 21 and 24 years of age, the former with a cub of the year and the latter with a yearling. Females this old more often have one cub than two, age having taken its toll. We also captured two different two-year-old bears. They will just have departed from their mothers and will have a challenging time ahead, when they have to learn to hunt on their own. One of them had managed to kill a ringed seal pup, that is at least a good breakfast.

Svalbard polar bear research: Day 4

Jon Aars is a researcher with the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway’s main institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. With the support of WWF, Aars studies polar bear populations on the Norwegian island of Svalbard. Read all of  his field notes from a Spring 2013 research expedition, and follow the bears on our Polar Bear Tracker.
N26135 MA (Medium)
14 April – After some days in southern Svalbard, the weather improved in more northern areas, and we sailed up north of Spitsbergen, at a latitude of about 80°. After lunch the weather was fine for flying, and we found an adult female in Woodfjorden, north-west Spitsbergen. Few polar bears survive long after they pass their early twenties, but this lady was marked in Woodfjorden already in 1994, as an adult with two small cubs, then estimated to be 7 years old. So at a likely age of 26 years, she will be one of the oldest bears around in Svalbard. She got a collar on, and hopefully she will still be able to hunt seals for a while, at least her condition seemed good.
We handled another two adult females, one together with a yearling and another with two small cubs. This is an area where a few females come out from maternity dens every spring, and most bears we encounter here are very local. Genetics have shown that daughters comes back to the fjords in this area and goes into den in the same area where they were born. Some may walk far into the pack ice north and northeast from there in summer, but will return before autumn. Other bears use the local area year around.

Svalbard polar bear research: Day 3

Jon Aars is a researcher with the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway’s main institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. With the support of WWF, Aars studies polar bear populations on the Norwegian island of Svalbard. Read all of  his field notes from a Spring 2013 research expedition, and follow the bears on our Polar Bear Tracker.
fig 6 (Medium)
10th April – Today we had a good day in field, with six bears handled. We flew quite far, to Edgeøya at the south-eastern part of Svalbard. Hunters who shot bears for hides many decades ago frequently stayed here over the winter, as many bears pass through the area.
In the morning we found fresh tracks from a female with two cubs, but lost them when the snow got so hard the prints were not longer visible. We started to get a bit low on fuel, but fortunately had a depot on the island where we could refuel and thus continue the search on the east side of the island.
In front of one of the big glaciers we again encountered tracks, this time from a pair of mating bears. April is mating season. Tracks from bears mating are quite distinctive, frequently with parallel tracks with a lot of sharp turns and no particular direction. We found the bears after some effort, and darted them. She was a recapture, marked last year, about six years old.
Later we found a polar bear maternity den, occupied by a visiting adult male, and likely already departed by the family. He also turned out to be a known bear, marked in 2008, now close to 15 years old. We then searched for a female with two small cubs out in some very structured sea ice, making it quite challenging to follow the tracks. But finally we found them, a young female with her first litter, two small cubs about weighing about 8 kilos. Back on the boat we finally got a deserved meal after a long day. When it’s below -20°C and windy all day, then a warm meal is always good to warm up.

Svalbard polar bear research: Day 2

Jon Aars is a researcher with the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway’s main institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. With the support of WWF, Aars studies polar bear populations on the Norwegian island of Svalbard. Read all of  his field notes from a Spring 2013 research expedition, and follow the bears on our Polar Bear Tracker.

The two sons of a female we captured today, back in 2007, in the same area. One of the two cubs of the pictures was killed in self defence when it tried to get into a cabin with two persons a few days ago.  Svalbard, Norway, April 2013 © Jon Aars / NPI

The two sons of a female we captured today, back in 2007, in the same area. One of the two cubs of the pictures was killed in self defence when it tried to get into a cabin with two persons a few days ago. Svalbard, Norway, April 2013 © Jon Aars / NPI


Yesterday we entered the Norwegian coast guard ship KV Svalbard, our home for the next couple of weeks. It is a great ship, and with a highly service-minded crew. Besides patrolling the areas around Svalbard to check that fishing boats follow the rules, they frequently help teams doing research in the area.
We planned to sail north, until we checked the weather forecast – snow and wind in that part of the archipelago. So we sailed south during the night, and surveyed Hornsund, the most southern fjord on the Spitsbergen west coast, today.
In the inner part, in front of the glaciers, we encountered tracks from two different adult females, with one and two small cubs respectively. However, we did not find the bears. But after some more searching, we found a single adult female, a twelve year old that was marked in Hornsund as a cub in 2001. We captured her in 2007 with two sons, her first litter. One of them was killed in self defense in a cabin a bit further west some days ago, when he tried to get into a cabin with two people. The female got a collar, and we located an adult male in the same area after a few minutes of flying. He was a large animal in his prime age, about 10 years old.

Svalbard polar bear research: Day 1

© Jon Aars / NPI

The foot of a polar bear, note the short and very sharp claws. Svalbard, Norway, April 2013


Jon Aars is a researcher with the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway’s main institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. With the support of WWF, Aars studies polar bear populations on the Norwegian island of Svalbard. Read all of  his field notes from a Spring 2013 research expedition, and follow the bears on our Polar Bear Tracker.
6th April – We were out for a short trip yesterday in Isfjorden, the fjord where Longyearbyen, the main settlement in Svalbard, is located. We did not encounter any bears, but it is always good to get started, to see that the helicopter is working and get all necessary gear on board. So today, we went out on a longer trip, and we flew south, to Van Mijenfjorden and Van Keulenfjorden. These two fjords on the west coast of Spitsbergen, the largest island of Svalbard, end in glaciers that stretch over to the east coast. Bears may cross over to the east frequently, where the water is colder and more bears are found. However, there are usually some bears also on the western side of the island, and particularly in spring.
The first part of the day, we did not encounter any bears, although we found some tracks. We spotted a ringed seal pup on the ice, far from the lair or from the closest breathing hole. It does happen they get too far away from the closest safe exit into the water, and the odds are then high they will be found by foxes, gulls or polar bears before they can escape.
After a couple of hours flying without encountering any bears, we finally found some fresh tracks in the outer part of Van Keulenfjorden. Here we found two adult females, only a few hundred meters apart, both on the sea ice on search for seals.
One was a seven year old female that had been earlier marked in the same area, originally in April 2008 as a two year old when still together with her mother. The other female was old, likely between 15 and 20 years of age, and not marked before. Accordingly, she got lip tattoos and ear marks so we will be able to recognize her if we capture her again another year. Finally, on a glacier, we found another old female, together with a one year old daughter. All the three adults were equipped with iridium telephone collars so we can follow their movements.

Arctic ocean acidification: winners and losers

Today at the international conference on Arctic Ocean Acidification, we’re talking about socioeconomic issues. The increasing acidity of Arctic waters is a complex story where  some marine species will be winners (adapting and thriving) and others losers (to the point of extinction). As for humans, we stand to lose big –ocean acidification is likely to impact the abundance, productivity and distribution of Arctic fisheries.
More acidic Arctic waters will affect everything from the price of fish, to the cost of fishing, to the benefits of fisheries to the indigenous populations of the Arctic. With a multi-billion dollar fishing industry and a large subsistence population that relies heavily on ocean resources for the majority of their dietary protein, Alaska is particularly vulnerable. If ocean acidification takes the fisheries out of western Alaska where communities live on what the land and the sea provide, food security will become a serious challenge.
To buy some time and adapt to the changing chemistry of Arctic waters, it’s important to manage the other stressors impacting Arctic ecosystems. That means policies to counteract the effects of ocean acidification must consider other human impacts, like increased shipping in the Arctic.

 “A key solution is to help the Arctic ecosystems to help themselves by decreasing all the other pressures. We need to collaborate with the ecosystems”

– Sam Dupont, lead author of the biological chapter of the Arctic Ocean Acidification assessment of the Arctic Council
The services provided by ecosystems have real economic value.  Acidification means that the very chemistry of these ecosystems are changing rapidly. But by planning for marine ecosystems that can remain resilient in the face of rapid change, we can ensure that species adapt, and the people of the Arctic don’t lose out.

Arctic ocean acidification, the other CO2 problem

© Erling Svensen / WWF-Canon

© Erling Svensen / WWF-Canon


During the opening day of the conference on Arctic Ocean Acidification, I was bombarded by technical vocabulary like omega aragonites*, fracturation in alkalinity and biogeochemical cycling. The whole day was dedicated to explaining the changing chemistry of the Arctic Ocean. By changing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, we are actually increasing the acidity of the ocean without fully understanding the future impacts on Arctic marine ecosystems.
Many international bodies are enhancing their efforts to understand ocean acidification and there is a growing interest amongst decision-makers.
Political cycles and the 2008 financial crisis have hindered global climate agreement negotiations in the past few years. For the US and China, ocean acidification is an opportunity to rekindle the discussion on carbon from a new angle.
The chemistry of ocean acidification science is straightforward and certain– we know it is happening now and rapidly – faster than in the last 56 milion years and it will continue as we emit more CO2 to the atmosphere through burning fossil fuels.
However, we must still bridge a large gap between science and policy on acidification.The potential costs of inaction are high. Healthy oceans provide vital services to people, for example by buffering some of the atmospheric CO2 emitted by human processes. Acidification may also put fisheries, and therefore food security, at risk.
Carol Turley of Plymouth Marine Laboratory, a pioneer in this field of research, emphasized that even if we cannot predict the exact costs, casualties and damages related to acidification, scientific uncertainties are no excuse to not act. “If you mitigate (that is, reduce emissions of CO2 to the atmosphere) for ocean acidification, you also mitigate for climate change – so double gain and double the reason to act now.”

10 strong key findings flowing from this three year assessment were released today:

Acidification in the Arctic Ocean:

  • Arctic marine waters are experiencing widespread and rapid ocean acidification.
  • The primary driver of ocean acidification is uptake of carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere by human activities.
  • The Arctic Ocean is especially vulnerable to ocean acidification.
  • Acidification is not uniform across the Arctic Ocean.

Biological responses to ocean acidification

  • Arctic marine ecosystems are highly likely to undergo significant change due to ocean acidification.
  • Ocean acidification will have direct and indirect effects on Arctic marine life. It is likely that some marine organisms will respond positively to new conditions associated with ocean acidification, while others will be disadvantage, possibly to the point of local extinction.
  • Ocean acidification impacts must be assessed in the context of other changes happening in Arctic waters.

Potential economic and social impacts of ocean acidification on Arctic fisheries

  • Ocean acidification is one of several factors that may contribute to alteration of fish species composition in the Arctic Ocean.
  • Ocean acidification may affect Arctic fisheries.
  • Ecosystem changes associated with ocean acidification may affect the livelihoods of Arctic peoples.

* Aragonite is a material used by some sorts of sea creatures to build their shells. As ocean acidity increases, the ability of the sea creatures to build their shells from aragonite decreases, and so removes a valuable resource from food webs.

Arctic Ocean Acidification, from pteropods to walrus

© WWF-Canon / Kevin Schafer

I have always been fascinated by the effects of climate change on our planet. What is so interesting with the Arctic is that climate change occurs twice as fast in high latitudes in comparison with the rest of the world. This week I am in Bergen in Norway where I’ll find out  more about another effect of the excess of carbon dioxide in the air, ocean acidification. The Arctic Council is sponsoring a conference here on this threat to the Arctic Ocean.
Arctic Ocean acidification will lead to significant effects on sea life. Acidification impacts on Arctic marine life are affecting the abundance of organisms such as pteropods (small sea snails) which serve as a foundation for the Arctic food web. The increasing acidity of the water makes it harder for them to build shells. If we lose great numbers of these key species at the heart of Arctic Ocean food webs, then other animals such as walruses will also be threatened, with impacts on Arctic communities. These changes also threaten multi-million dollar Arctic fisheries.
It is increasingly clear from the scientific findings that immediate cuts in CO2 emissions are essential to slow the acidification of the Arctic Ocean. Knowledge about this environmental problem has expanded rapidly in recent years. WWF believes the research being discussed here this week should pressure the Arctic Council and its members to create a coordinated voice by Arctic states and observer states in global negotiations on climate change. As producers of much of the global supply of carbon dioxide pollution, the Arctic states and Arctic Council observers have an obligation to lead in these negotiations.

Tracking narwhals – January 2013

Two narwhal (Monodon monoceros) surfacing to breathe in Admiralty Inlet, Lancaster Sound, Nunavut, Canada. © Paul Nicklen/National Geographic Stock / WWF-Canada


The four remaining functioning satellite radio tags were still transmitting information up to Christmas Day or thereabouts – but there have been no signals since then.  This is of course unfortunate, but also one of the realities sometimes of biological field studies using high-tech equipment like this!
Visit the WWF narwhal tracker
It’s possible that there has been some software/electronic signal transmission glitch along the information chain – all four radios seem to have stopped in the same week in late December.  But its also conceivable that the narwhals were having to push up some sea-ice in their wintering-feeding areas, and that could have caused the transmitter units mounted along their dorsal ridge to break free, and the just fall to the depths of Baffin Bay-Davis Strait.
On the bright side though, we did manage to establish the migratory path the whales took from August to December, and we showed that this year’s main wintering-feeding areas were quite a bit further south for most of the tagged animals, than in 2012 and some previous years.  All of this information is really vital to understanding where narwhal need to be to do their natural ‘thing’ – in the face of anticipated upcoming decisions about planned future seismic explosions and surveys/drilling for oil and gas deposits, as well as increased shipping and commercial fishing pressures in and around Baffin Bay and northern Davis Strait.
WWF-Canada will be monitoring this situation closely in the coming months, and will post any significant news updates on this narwhal tracker page – as well as news if the radios suddenly start transmitting again (this has happened in the past with other species!).

Tracking narwhals – December 2012

Visit the WWF narwhal tracker
The 4 narwhals still with working satellite transmitters are now spending most of their time towards the edge of the Canadian continental shelf, at the edge of Davis Strait, not far from the international boundary with Greenland.  They are likely feeding in relatively nutrient rich areas, probably mainly on Greenland Halibut.
At this time of year there’s often some satellite errors in the position fixes.  But with multiple fixes, one can  readily derive the most reliable positions over a 10-day period.  Indeed, these whales are now either just at the edge of the 9-10/10ths coverage annual sea ice, or in the case of narwhal #115957 and probably #115959, breathing at leads and cracks among the ice sheets.  Remember that the counter-clockwise currents in this productive Baffin Bay system maintain mobility of sea ice offshore, even though maximum surface air temperatures are often -20C now.  And narwhal can probably detect such gaps quite readily as they surface, using their echo-location click mechanisms.